Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add support for booting with ACPI
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-06-17 12:45:55
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-gpio, linux-i2c, linux-usb, lkml
Hi, Lee Jones [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Felipe Balbi wrote:quoted
Hi, Lee Jones [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
In Linux, the DWC3 core exists as its own independent platform device. Thus when describing relationships in Device Tree, the current default boot configuration table option, the DWC3 core often resides as a child of the platform specific node. Both of which are given their own address space descriptions and the drivers can be mostly agnostic to each other. However, other Operating Systems have taken a more monolithic approach, which is evident in the configuration ACPI tables for the Qualcomm Snapdragon SDM850, where all DWC3 (core and platform) components are described under a single IO memory region. To ensure successful booting using the supplied ACPI tables, we need to devise a way to chop up the address regions provided and subsequently register the DWC3 core with the resultant information, which is precisely what this patch aims to achieve. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <redacted> --- drivers/usb/dwc3/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)I'm starting to get a little twitchy about these patches now. Due to the release cadence of the larger Linux distros, it's pretty important that these changes land in v5.3. Without them, it is impossible to install Linux on some pretty high profile emerging platforms. It's already -rc5 and I'm concerned that we're going to miss the merge-window. Would you be kind enough to review these patches please? The Pinctrl and I2C parts of the set have already been merged.I don't seem to have this series in my inbox. This is the only email I have in this series.I did wonder, which is why I made sure I sent this to your Intel address as well. Is your @kernel.org address broken?
not really, that drops in a valid inbox. I didn't receive it in either, however. :-s
Will re-send the patches to your Intel address, give me a few minutes.
Thanks. -- balbi