On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:53:33 +0200 David Hildenbrand [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
...
- Rebased on linux-next (next-20190611)
Yet the patch you've prepared is designed for 5.3. Was that
deliberate, or should we be targeting earlier kernels?
It was deliberate for 5.3 as a preparation for upcoming reworked arm64 hot-remove.
We should probably add to the patch description something like "This is
a preparation for arm64 memory hotremove. The described issue is not
relevant on other architectures."
Please. And is there any reason to merge it separately? Can it be
[patch 1/3] in the "arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove" series?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel