Thread (72 messages) 72 messages, 9 authors, 2019-06-12

Re: [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2019-06-12 11:05:17
Also in: amd-gfx, dri-devel, kvm, linux-kselftest, linux-media, linux-mm, linux-rdma, lkml

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:03:10PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:39 PM Catalin Marinas [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
quoted
Should I drop access_ok() change from my patch, since yours just reverts it?
Not necessary, your patch just relaxes the ABI for all apps, mine
tightens it. You could instead move the untagging to __range_ok() and
rebase my patch accordingly.
OK, will do. I'll also add a comment next to TIF_TAGGED_ADDR as Vincenzo asked.
Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help