RE: [PATCH v8 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: xilinx: Add Xilinx MIPI CSI-2 Rx Subsystem
From: Vishal Sagar <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-06 12:23:15
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-media, lkml
Hi Sakari,
-----Original Message----- From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 5:43 PM To: Vishal Sagar <redacted> Cc: Vishal Sagar <redacted>; Hyun Kwon <redacted>; laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com; mchehab@kernel.org; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; Michal Simek [off-list ref]; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; hans.verkuil@cisco.com; linux-arm- kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dinesh Kumar [off-list ref]; Sandip Kothari [off-list ref]; Luca Ceresoli [off-list ref]; Jacopo Mondi [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: xilinx: Add Xilinx MIPI CSI-2 Rx Subsystem Hi Vishal, On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 11:54:19AM +0000, Vishal Sagar wrote:quoted
Hi Sakari,quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2019 12:54 AM To: Vishal Sagar <redacted> Cc: Hyun Kwon <redacted>; laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com; mchehab@kernel.org; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;Michalquoted
quoted
Simek [off-list ref]; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; hans.verkuil@cisco.com; linux-arm- kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dinesh Kumar [off-list ref]; Sandip Kothari [off-list ref]; Luca Ceresoli [off-list ref]; Jacopo Mondi [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: xilinx: Add XilinxMIPIquoted
quoted
CSI-2 Rx Subsystem EXTERNAL EMAIL Hi Vishal, On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:29:30PM +0530, Vishal Sagar wrote:quoted
+Optional properties: +-------------------- +- . + Without this property the driver won't be loaded as IP won't be able togeneratequoted
+ media bus format compliant stream output.I think we previously concluded that the format will be just different in this case. So the description appears incorrect.Referring to your email https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/22/1823 in response tov6 patches,quoted
if the video format bridge is not enabled, then the way in which pixels aretransported onquoted
the bus don't correspond to the existing media bus formats in Linux. If not loading the driver is incorrect way, is it ok for the driver to allow samemedia bus formatquoted
for packed and unpacked data type on the sink pad? Or is it ok for the driver to not validate the media bus format set on the sinkpad? Taking a fresh look at the issue --- usually such unpacking is done by the DMA engine, or the same device contains both the CSI-2 RX and DMA. But here it actually affects the input of that DMA engine. You're right in saying we don't have format definitions from which you could tell which case it is, and we also don't have other pre-existing means to tell them apart. Feel free to keep the check in the driver, but we can't refer to the driver loading in DT binding documentation: this is really not supposed to be related to that driver, or even Linux at all.
Ok got it. The description here shouldn't be specific to driver. I will keep the check in driver.
How about changing this to: xlnx,vfb: Present when Video Format Bridge is enabled in IP configuration. That'd be aligned with the other properties and would more accurately convey what this means.
Agree this is a good way to define the property. I will update it the description as mentioned here.
-- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com
Regards Vishal Sagar _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel