Re: [PATCH 5/8] drivers: media: coda: fix warning same module names
From: Hans Verkuil <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-06 10:13:25
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-media, lkml, netdev
On 6/6/19 11:47 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA and CONFIG_CODA_FS enabled as loadable modules, we see the following warning: warning: same module names found: fs/coda/coda.ko drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko Rework so media coda matches the config fragment. Leaving CODA_FS as is since thats a well known module. Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <redacted> --- drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile index 54e9a73a92ab..588e6bf7c190 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile +++ b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only -coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o +video-coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += coda.o +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += video-coda.o
How about imx-coda? video-coda suggests it is part of the video subsystem, which it isn't. Regards, Hans
obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_VDOA) += imx-vdoa.o
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel