Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 7 authors, 2019-06-04

RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] soc/fsl/qe: cleanups and new DT binding

From: Leo Li <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-03 19:55:56
Also in: linux-devicetree, linuxppc-dev, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Rasmus Villemoes <redacted>
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 2:54 PM
To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@nxp.com>; Leo Li
[off-list ref]
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Rob Herring [off-list ref]; Scott
Wood [off-list ref]; Christophe Leroy [off-list ref];
Mark Rutland [off-list ref]; jocke@infinera.com
[off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] soc/fsl/qe: cleanups and new DT binding

On 13/05/2019 13.14, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
quoted
This small series consists of some small cleanups and simplifications
of the QUICC engine driver, and introduces a new DT binding that makes
it much easier to support other variants of the QUICC engine IP block
that appears in the wild: There's no reason to expect in general that
the number of valid SNUMs uniquely determines the set of such, so it's
better to simply let the device tree specify the values (and,
implicitly via the array length, also the count).

Which tree should this go through?
Ping? These patches should be ready to go in, but I don't know who is
supposed to pick them up.
I can pick them up through the soc/fsl tree.

Regards,
Leo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help