Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2019-05-30

RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: fix watchdog device node

From: Chuanhua Han <hidden>
Date: 2019-05-30 05:00:03
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Sent: 2019年5月24日 20:29
To: Chuanhua Han <redacted>
Cc: Leo Li <redacted>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>;
mark.rutland@arm.com; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ying Zhang
[off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: fix watchdog device node

Caution: EXT Email

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:48 AM Chuanhua Han [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
Hi, Rob Herring
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Leo Li
Sent: 2019年5月22日 14:50
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
-             wdog0: watchdog@23c0000 {
-                     compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-wdt",
"fsl,imx21-wdt";
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
-                     reg = <0x0 0x23c0000 0x0 0x10000>;
-                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 59
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
quoted
quoted
quoted
-                     clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>;
-                     big-endian;
-                     status = "disabled";
+             cluster1_core0_watchdog: wdt@c000000 {
Keep 'watchdog' as the node name,
Thanks for your replay
Do you mean replace the ‘wdt’ with ‘watchdog’?
and keep nodes sort in unit-address.
What does this mean?
That means order the nodes by the addresses (e.g. c000000,
c010000)
The current order is correct(The first is c000000, then c000000).
But they are added after gpio@2320000 and before sata@3200000.
I changed and made the second version of the patch, but I found
the following error when I executed ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
xxx.patch to check the patch:

WARNING: DT compatible string vendor "arm" appears un-documented
-- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
#43: FILE: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi:351:
+ compatible = "arm,sp805", "arm,primecell";

However, there is no vendor-prefixes.txt file in the
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ directory, only vendor-
prefixes.yaml.
Moreover, there are ‘arm’ vendors in vendor-prefixes.yaml.
Added Rob Herring to the thread.
quoted
Request help,thanks
How can I solve this patch check error? Ask for help, thank you!
Ignore it. A fix to checkpatch.pl is pending.
OK, the second version has been sent. Checking with checkpatch.pl is no problem.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help