On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:50:41AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

Hi Torsten,

Thank you for the patch.

Thank you for the thorough review!

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 08:53:56AM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:

quoted

+{
+	struct anx6345 *anx6345 = connector_to_anx6345(connector);
+	int err, num_modes = 0;
+	bool power_off = false;
+
+	mutex_lock(&anx6345->lock);
+
+	if (!anx6345->edid) {

Could the chip be used with a hot-pluggable display, or is it guaranteed
that EDID will never change ?

The chip itself is capable of (e)DP hot-plugging, so the signals suggest.
See the previous discussions about what to expect on the output side.
Currently, the driver does not handle hot-plugging.

quoted

+
+	err = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(client->dev.of_node, 1, 0,
+					  &anx6345->panel, NULL);
+	if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		return err;
+
+	if (err)
+		DRM_DEBUG("No panel found\n");

Shouldn't this be fatal ?

No, basically same as above. On the output side, there can be a panel,
another bridge, or some eDP plug. If the DT didn't explicitly specify
a panel or a bridge, we can still generate video output as soon as
there is valid EDID data.

Your other points went straight onto my TODO list.

	Torsten


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel