On Mon 20 May 19:30 PDT 2019, Alex Elder wrote:
On 5/20/19 8:32 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
quoted
quoted
If you are telling me that the command/data flag resides at bit
7 of the first byte, I will update the field masks in a later
patch in this series to reflect that.
Higher order bit is Command / Data.
So what this means is that to get the command/data bit we use:
first_byte & 0x80
If that is correct I will remove this patch from the series and
will update the subsequent patches so bit 7 is the command bit,
bit 6 is reserved, and bits 0-5 are the pad length.
I will post a v2 of the series with these changes, and will
incorporate Bjorn's "Reviewed-by".
But didn't you say that your testing show that the current bit order is
wrong?
I still like the cleanup, if nothing else just to clarify and clearly
document the actual content of this header.
Regards,
Bjorn
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel