[PATCH v2 2/8] soc: tegra: fuse: Use dma_request_channel instead of __dma_request_channel()
From: Baolin Wang <hidden>
Date: 2019-05-20 11:32:44
Also in:
dmaengine, linux-tegra, lkml
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
The __dma_request_channel() prototype has been changed to help to do device node validation, thus we can use dma_request_channel() instead of __dma_request_channel() to keep kernel bisectable. Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <redacted> --- drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
index 49ff017..f40a06f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int tegra20_fuse_probe(struct tegra_fuse *fuse) dma_cap_zero(mask); dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask); - fuse->apbdma.chan = __dma_request_channel(&mask, dma_filter, NULL); + fuse->apbdma.chan = dma_request_channel(mask, dma_filter, NULL); if (!fuse->apbdma.chan) return -EPROBE_DEFER;
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel