Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: marvell: select target before setting up data interface
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Date: 2019-03-30 18:20:41
Also in:
stable
Subsystem:
marvell nand controller driver, memory technology devices (mtd), nand flash subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra, Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:21:42 +0100 Daniel Mack [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Miquel, On 25/3/2019 10:09 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:quoted
Daniel Mack [off-list ref] wrote on Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:48:08 +0100:quoted
Hi Miquel, On 22/3/2019 9:30 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:quoted
+ Richard: this is fixes materials Daniel Mack [off-list ref] wrote on Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:20:10 +0100:quoted
Now that the nand drivers are responsible for selecting the target prior to hardware access, a call to marvell_nfc_select_target() is necessary from marvell_nfc_setup_data_interface(). This is a regression introduced by commit b25251414f6e ("mtd: rawnand: marvell: Stop implementing ->select_chip()"). Fixes: b25251414f6e ("mtd: rawnand: marvell: Stop implementing ->select_chip()") Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Cc: <redacted> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org> --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c index 84283c6bb0ff..93abe5be8995 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c@@ -2325,6 +2325,8 @@ static int marvell_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr, struct marvell_nfc_timings nfc_tmg; int read_delay; + marvell_nfc_select_target(chip, chip->cur_cs); + sdr = nand_get_sdr_timings(conf); if (IS_ERR(sdr)) return PTR_ERR(sdr);I had a short look yesterday and this is very likely to be the root cause of the regression, thank you very much!Yes it is, it fixes the regression I have reported. Do you want me to resend with that nit addressed you mentioned? My version works well, I know that much :)Yes please, resent with Boris' comment addressed and we'll be fine.I tried this now, and with 'chip->cur_cs' instead of 'chipnr', the regression is back. This function is invoked twice during boot, and in both cases, 'chip->cur_cs' is -1, while 'chipnr' is 0. The 2nd time this function is invoked, the 'selected_die' cache value is 0, so marvell_nfc_select_target() bails early, which seems to be a problem. I can't quite make sense of that yet, all I know is that calling marvell_nfc_select_target() with -1 from marvell_nfc_setup_data_interface() makes the driver functional again. Hmm.
Can you try with the following diff applied? --->8---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
index f38e5c1b87e4..e8eccf6afc8f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c@@ -722,9 +722,6 @@ static void marvell_nfc_select_target(struct nand_chip *chip, struct marvell_nfc *nfc = to_marvell_nfc(chip->controller); u32 ndcr_generic; - if (chip == nfc->selected_chip && die_nr == marvell_nand->selected_die) - return; - writel_relaxed(marvell_nand->ndtr0, nfc->regs + NDTR0); writel_relaxed(marvell_nand->ndtr1, nfc->regs + NDTR1);
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel