Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] rtc: mt6397: fix alarm register overwrite
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-03-11 20:50:37
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-rtc, lkml
Hi, On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 8:49 PM Hsin-Hsiung Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Ran Bi <redacted>
Alarm registers high byte was reserved for other functions.
This add mask in alarm registers operation functions.
This also fix error condition in interrupt handler.
Fixes: fc2979118f3f ("rtc: mediatek: Add MT6397 RTC driver")add a Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org here to apply to all stable kernels for the critical fixup patch.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <redacted> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c index e9a25ec..f85f1fc 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c@@ -55,6 +55,14 @@ #define RTC_AL_SEC 0x0018 +#define RTC_AL_SEC_MASK 0x003f +#define RTC_AL_MIN_MASK 0x003f +#define RTC_AL_HOU_MASK 0x001f +#define RTC_AL_DOM_MASK 0x001f +#define RTC_AL_DOW_MASK 0x0007 +#define RTC_AL_MTH_MASK 0x000f +#define RTC_AL_YEA_MASK 0x007f + #define RTC_PDN2 0x002e #define RTC_PDN2_PWRON_ALARM BIT(4)@@ -111,7 +119,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data) irqen = irqsta & ~RTC_IRQ_EN_AL; mutex_lock(&rtc->lock); if (regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_IRQ_EN, - irqen) < 0) + irqen) == 0) mtk_rtc_write_trigger(rtc); mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);@@ -233,12 +241,12 @@ static int mtk_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm) alm->pending = !!(pdn2 & RTC_PDN2_PWRON_ALARM); mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock); - tm->tm_sec = data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC]; - tm->tm_min = data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN]; - tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR]; - tm->tm_mday = data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM]; - tm->tm_mon = data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH]; - tm->tm_year = data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR]; + tm->tm_sec = data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] & RTC_AL_SEC_MASK; + tm->tm_min = data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] & RTC_AL_MIN_MASK; + tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] & RTC_AL_HOU_MASK; + tm->tm_mday = data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] & RTC_AL_DOM_MASK; + tm->tm_mon = data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] & RTC_AL_MTH_MASK; + tm->tm_year = data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] & RTC_AL_YEA_MASK; tm->tm_year += RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET; tm->tm_mon--;@@ -259,14 +267,25 @@ static int mtk_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm) tm->tm_year -= RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET; tm->tm_mon++; - data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] = tm->tm_sec; - data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] = tm->tm_min; - data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] = tm->tm_hour; - data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] = tm->tm_mday; - data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] = tm->tm_mon; - data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] = tm->tm_year; - mutex_lock(&rtc->lock); + ret = regmap_bulk_read(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_AL_SEC, + data, RTC_OFFSET_COUNT); + if (ret < 0) + goto exit; +
Why did we need an additional regmap_bulk_read here? I would suppose data[RTC_OFFSET_*] & ~(RTC_AL_*_MASK) is always equal to 0. It might be another fixup since change is not being mentioned in the git message.
+ data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] & ~(RTC_AL_SEC_MASK)) |
+ (tm->tm_sec & RTC_AL_SEC_MASK));
+ data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] & ~(RTC_AL_MIN_MASK)) |
+ (tm->tm_min & RTC_AL_MIN_MASK));
+ data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] & ~(RTC_AL_HOU_MASK)) |
+ (tm->tm_hour & RTC_AL_HOU_MASK));
+ data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] & ~(RTC_AL_DOM_MASK)) |
+ (tm->tm_mday & RTC_AL_DOM_MASK));
+ data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] & ~(RTC_AL_MTH_MASK)) |
+ (tm->tm_mon & RTC_AL_MTH_MASK));
+ data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] & ~(RTC_AL_YEA_MASK)) |
+ (tm->tm_year & RTC_AL_YEA_MASK));
+
if (alm->enabled) {
ret = regmap_bulk_write(rtc->regmap,
rtc->addr_base + RTC_AL_SEC,
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel