RE: [PATCH 2/3] clk: imx8mq: add hdmi_phy_27m clock as pll's reference clock
From: Anson Huang <hidden>
Date: 2019-03-07 12:56:13
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi, Lucas Best Regards! Anson Huang
-----Original Message----- From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.stach@pengutronix.de] Sent: 2019年3月7日 20:06 To: Anson Huang <redacted>; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; kernel@pengutronix.de; Fabio Estevam [off-list ref]; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; Abel Vesa [off-list ref]; agx@sigxcpu.org; linux-arm- kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Cc: dl-linux-imx <redacted> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: imx8mq: add hdmi_phy_27m clock as pll's reference clock Am Donnerstag, den 07.03.2019, 03:41 +0000 schrieb Anson Huang:quoted
There is another 27MHz OSC inside i.MX8MQ's display block and it can be one of reference clocks of all PLLs, add it into clock tree and also add it as PLL's reference clock. Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <redacted> --- drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.cb/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c index a9b3888..bb1bf9b 100644--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static u32 share_count_nand;static struct clk *clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_END]; -static const char * const pll_ref_sels[] = { "osc_25m", "osc_27m", "dummy", "dummy", }; +static const char * const pll_ref_sels[] = { "osc_25m", "osc_27m", +"osc_hdmi_phy_27m", "dummy", }; static const char * const arm_pll_bypass_sels[] = {"arm_pll", "arm_pll_ref_sel", }; static const char * const gpu_pll_bypass_sels[] = {"gpu_pll", "gpu_pll_ref_sel", }; static const char * const vpu_pll_bypass_sels[] = {"vpu_pll", "vpu_pll_ref_sel", }; @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ static intimx8mq_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)quoted
clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_32K] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "ckil"); clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_25M] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "osc_25m"); clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_27M] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "osc_27m"); + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_HDMI_PHY_27M] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, +"osc_hdmi_phy_27m");This is not acceptable. This adds a new required clock input, without bothering to add the corresponding binding information or thinking about backwards compatibility. At this point there are existing DTs out there, which don't provide this required clock, which will cause a full boot regression. This can only be an optional clock input at this point.
What do you think if we don't get such clock from DT? Just register this fixed clock in clock driver directly, then there will be no dependency of DT. Anson.
Regards, Lucasquoted
clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_EXT1] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "clk_ext1"); clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_EXT2] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "clk_ext2"); clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_EXT3] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "clk_ext3");
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel