Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] clk: mediatek: Add MT8183 clock support
From: Weiyi Lu <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-27 02:51:46
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-mediatek, lkml, stable
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 09:50 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Weiyi Lu (2019-02-01 00:30:12)quoted
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8183.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8183.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e9de9fe774ca --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8183.c@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// +// Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc. +// Author: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> + +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +[....]quoted
+ +static int clk_mt8183_top_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + void __iomem *base; + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data; + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; + + base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(base)) { + pr_err("%s(): ioremap failed\n", __func__);This API already prints an error so please remove this duplicate error message
ok, I'll remove those duplicate error message in next version.
quoted
+ return PTR_ERR(base); + } + + clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_TOP_NR_CLK); + + mtk_clk_register_fixed_clks(top_fixed_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_fixed_clks), + clk_data); + + mtk_clk_register_factors(top_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_divs), clk_data); + + mtk_clk_register_muxes(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), + node, &mt8183_clk_lock, clk_data); + + mtk_clk_register_composites(top_aud_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_aud_muxes), + base, &mt8183_clk_lock, clk_data); + + mtk_clk_register_composites(top_aud_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_aud_divs), + base, &mt8183_clk_lock, clk_data); + + mtk_clk_register_gates(node, top_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_clks), + clk_data); + + return of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_onecell_get, clk_data); +} + +static int clk_mt8183_infra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data; + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; + + clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_INFRA_NR_CLK); + + mtk_clk_register_gates(node, infra_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(infra_clks), + clk_data); + + return of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_onecell_get, clk_data); +} + +static int clk_mt8183_mcu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data; + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; + void __iomem *base; + struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + + base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(base)) { + pr_err("%s(): ioremap failed\n", __func__); + return PTR_ERR(base); + } + + clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_MCU_NR_CLK);Can this fail? It doesn't seem to be checked for failure so I guess we don't care?
It might fail but we have data validity checks in all the mtk_clk_register APIs.
quoted
+ + mtk_clk_register_composites(mcu_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(mcu_muxes), base, + &mt8183_clk_lock, clk_data); + + return of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_onecell_get, clk_data); +} +_______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel