Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] ARM: davinci: WARN_ON() if clk_get() fails
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-26 12:09:16
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
wt., 5 lut 2019 o 03:18 David Lechner [off-list ref] napisał(a):
On 2/4/19 11:17 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:quoted
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted> Currently the timer code checks if the clock pointer passed to it is good (!IS_ERR(clk)). The new clocksource driver expects the clock to be functional and doesn't perform any checks so emit a warning if clk_get() fails. Apply this to all davinci platforms. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted> --- arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c | 4 ++++ arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 4 ++++ arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c | 4 ++++ arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c | 4 ++++ arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c | 4 ++++ arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c | 4 ++++ 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c index 2cc9fe4c3a91..9a4b749cbb6b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c@@ -834,6 +834,10 @@ void __init da830_init_time(void) da830_pll_init(NULL, pll, NULL); clk = clk_get(NULL, "timer0"); + if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk))) { + pr_err("Unable to get the timer clock\n");Do we really need a warning _and_ an error?
That will give us the reason AND point us to the right place in the code. Bart
quoted
+ return; + } davinci_timer_init(clk); }
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel