On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:38 PM Angus Ainslie [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Daniel,

On 2019-01-20 02:58, Daniel Baluta wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:32 AM Angus Ainslie (Purism) [off-list ref]
wrote:

quoted

On i.mx8 mscale B0 chip, AHB/SDMA clock ratio 2:1 can't be supportted,
since SDMA clock ratio has to be increased to 250Mhz, AHB can't reach
to 500Mhz, so use 1:1 instead.

based on NXP commit MLK-16841-1

Hi Angus,

Thanks for doing this!

I'm not sure specifying the MLK here helps. I think it would be better
to somehow add the original Signed-off-by and mention that the commit
was pulled from NXP linux-imx tree.

If it was exactly the same patch I would have but as I added the lines
in
sdma_run_channel0 I didn't think it would be right to put signed off by
"Robin Gong [off-list ref]" as the code isn't what he signed off
on.

I see your point. I often encounter this scenario when sending patches.
I think the best solution would be to mention in the commit message
the author of the initial patch which you based your work on.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel