Re: [PATCH 08/13] clk: qcom: hfpll: CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED
From: Jorge Ramirez <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-17 08:38:23
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
Subsystem:
cpu frequency scaling framework, the rest · Maintainers:
"Rafael J. Wysocki", Viresh Kumar, Linus Torvalds
On 1/17/19 07:33, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 17 Dec 01:46 PST 2018, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:quoted
When COMMON_CLK_DISABLED_UNUSED is set, in an effort to save power and to keep the software model of the clock in line with reality, the framework transverses the clock tree and disables those clocks that were enabled by the firmware but have not been enabled by any device driver. If CPUFREQ is enabled, early during the system boot, it might attempt to change the CPU frequency ("set_rate"). If the HFPLL is selected as a provider, it will then change the rate for this clock. As boot continues, clk_disable_unused_subtree will run. Since it wont find a valid counter (enable_count) for a clock that is actually enabled it will attempt to disable it which will cause the CPU to stop. Notice that in this driver, calls to check whether the clock is enabled are routed via the is_enabled callback which queries the hardware.With the CPUFREQ referencing the CPU clock driver, that has decided to run off this clock, why is it not refcounted?
COMMON_CLK_DISABLED_UNUSED relies on the enable_count reference counter to disable the clocks that were enabled by the firwmare and not by the drivers. the cpufreq driver does not enable the cpu clock. so when clk_change_rate is called, the enable_count counter is not incremented and therefore it just remains null since this was enabled by the firmware. I tried doing:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index e58bfcb..5a9f83e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c@@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ static int resources_available(void) return ret; } + ret = clk_prepare_enable(cpu_clk); + if (ret) + return ret; + clk_put(cpu_clk); name = find_supply_name(cpu_dev);
and that removed the need for CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED. But I am not sure of the system wide consequences of that change to cpufreq. maybe Viresh can comment?
Regards, Bjornquoted
The following commit, rather than marking the clock critical and forcing the clock to be always enabled, addresses the above scenario making sure the clock is not disabled but it continues to rely on the firmware to enable the clock. Co-developed-by: Niklas Cassel <redacted> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <redacted> --- drivers/clk/qcom/hfpll.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/hfpll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/hfpll.c index 0ffed0d..9d92f5d 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/hfpll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/hfpll.c@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static int qcom_hfpll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo" }, .num_parents = 1, .ops = &clk_ops_hfpll, + .flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, }; h = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*h), GFP_KERNEL);-- 2.7.4
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel