Hello,

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:22:50PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:

Quoting Michał Mirosław (2018-12-17 11:37:05)

quoted

This makes for 3 clk_round_rate() calls instead of 64 of them on
SAMA5D2-based board when searching for 12.288MHz clock.

Ok, but is that better? Worse? Can you more clearly describe what you're
doing here? And it's not breaking some other corner case?

I think there isn't even a policy how clk_round_rate() actually behaves,
is there? If you could rely on it to (say) always round down cases like
these could maybe be handled easier? (But I didn't really look at the
patch, so this might not be one of these cases.)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel