On 18-12-18, 11:05, Doug Anderson wrote:
OK, it's fine with me to have the fallback, but if we do we should be
consistent about it and make sure it's in all the bindings and device
tree files...
Sure.
I am not sure what's the right way to do it is, i.e. should we keep the
"operating-points-v2" string or not. Another example I see is (which can be
compared here) is the board specific DT files. Normally the root node's
compatible is a long list of strings like:
compatible = "nvidia,p2371-2180", "nvidia,p2180", "nvidia,tegra210";
which starts from platform-specific string, then mach, then board, etc..
We do keep all of them in those cases and that makes me wonder why the same
shouldn't be done for OPP bindings.
--
viresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel