Thread (2 messages) read the whole thread 2 messages, 2 authors, 2018-12-19

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add gpu and gmu device nodes

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2018-12-19 04:49:01
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-pm

On 18-12-18, 11:05, Doug Anderson wrote:
OK, it's fine with me to have the fallback, but if we do we should be
consistent about it and make sure it's in all the bindings and device
tree files...
Sure.

I am not sure what's the right way to do it is, i.e. should we keep the
"operating-points-v2" string or not. Another example I see is (which can be
compared here) is the board specific DT files. Normally the root node's
compatible is a long list of strings like:

compatible = "nvidia,p2371-2180", "nvidia,p2180", "nvidia,tegra210";

which starts from platform-specific string, then mach, then board, etc..

We do keep all of them in those cases and that makes me wonder why the same
shouldn't be done for OPP bindings.

-- 
viresh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help