Quoting Shawn Guo (2018-12-13 17:01:02)
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 04:51:18PM +0000, Aisheng Dong wrote:
quoted
[...]
quoted
quoted
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
@@ -34,5 +34,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SX) += clk-imx6sx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6UL) += clk-imx6ul.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D) += clk-imx7d.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX7ULP) += clk-imx7ulp.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_VF610) += clk-vf610.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o
Nit: Do we want to keep CONFIG_ sorted?
IMHO It might be okay to make MX8 (ARM64) a new group to start
To get a clear separation. (Slightly not sorted due to VF610)
Anyway, it leaves to Stephen to make the judge.
I think Daniel is suggesting that we put CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ prior to
CONFIG_SOC_IMX1, so that all CONFIG_CLK_xxx options go before
CONFIG_SOC_xxx and the list is still naturally alphabetically sorted.
Fine by me. Please resend this patch with the final decision.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel