On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:40 AM Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 23:00, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x19f90): Section mismatch in reference from the function littleton_init_lcd() to the function .init.text:pxa_set_fb_info()
The function littleton_init_lcd() references
the function __init pxa_set_fb_info().
This is often because littleton_init_lcd lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of pxa_set_fb_info is wrong.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xf824): Section mismatch in reference from the function zeus_register_ohci() to the function .init.text:pxa_set_ohci_info()
The function zeus_register_ohci() references
the function __init pxa_set_ohci_info().
This is often because zeus_register_ohci lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of pxa_set_ohci_info is wrong.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xf95c): Section mismatch in reference from the function cm_x300_init_u2d() to the function .init.text:pxa3xx_set_u2d_info()
The function cm_x300_init_u2d() references
the function __init pxa3xx_set_u2d_info().
This is often because cm_x300_init_u2d lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of pxa3xx_set_u2d_info is wrong.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

I have queued a bunch of pxa changes via my mmc tree for gpio
descriptor conversions, by Linus Walleij.

Are those causing this problem? Should I queue this one via mmc tree as well?

Nopes just correlation without causation...

I also made a bunch of patches to PXA through the regulator tree,
those are not related either.

It *seems* they touch so different code lines that it shouldn't
be a problem to merge orthogonally in ARM SoC.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel