On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:02:23PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

On 10/31/2018 11:27 PM, Punit Agrawal wrote:

quoted

Stage 2 fault handler marks a page as executable if it is handling an
execution fault or if it was a permission fault in which case the
executable bit needs to be preserved.

The logic to decide if the page should be marked executable is
duplicated for PMD and PTE entries. To avoid creating another copy
when support for PUD hugepages is introduced refactor the code to
share the checks needed to mark a page table entry as executable.

Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <redacted>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
index 59595207c5e1..6912529946fb 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c

@@ -1475,7 +1475,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
 			  unsigned long fault_status)
 {
 	int ret;
-	bool write_fault, exec_fault, writable, force_pte = false;
+	bool write_fault, writable, force_pte = false;
+	bool exec_fault, needs_exec;

New line not required, still within 80 characters.

He's trying to logically group the two variables.  I don't see a problem
with that.


Thanks,

    Christoffer

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel