On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:29:40PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:

On 03. 12. 18 16:47, Mike Rapoport wrote:

quoted

Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and
then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock
function that returns a virtual address.

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <redacted>
---
 arch/microblaze/mm/init.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c b/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c
index b17fd8a..44f4b89 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c

@@ -363,8 +363,9 @@ void __init *early_get_page(void)
 	 * Mem start + kernel_tlb -> here is limit
 	 * because of mem mapping from head.S
 	 */
-	return __va(memblock_alloc_base(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE,
-				memory_start + kernel_tlb));
+	return memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE,
+				MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT, memory_start + kernel_tlb,
+				NUMA_NO_NODE);
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */

I can't see any issue with functionality when this patch is applied.
If you want me to take this via my tree please let me know.

I thought to route this via mmotm tree.

Otherwise:

Tested-by: Michal Simek <redacted>

Thanks!

 

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs
U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP/Versal SoCs

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel