Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2018-12-07

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] mm: PG_reserved cleanups and documentation

From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-05 13:04:50
Also in: linux-mediatek, linux-mm, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev, lkml

On 05.12.18 13:56, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 05-12-18 13:28:44, David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]
quoted
Most notably, for device memory we can hopefully soon stop setting
it PG_reserved
I am busy as hell so I am not likely to look at specific patche this
week. But could you be more specific why we need to get rid of other
PG_reserved users before we can do so for device memory?
No worries, this has time.

For device memory, nothing should really be needed. I am only collecting
and docuumenting users and this is one user soon to go (eventually) :)
I am all for removing relicts because they just confuse people but I
fail to see any relation here.
It's really only "why is this patch set not bigger", nothing related to
device memory actually :)

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help