Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2018-12-07

[PATCH 2/2] gpio: mt7621: pass mediatek_gpio_bank_probe() failure up the stack

From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hidden>
Date: 2018-11-27 08:38:00
Also in: linux-gpio, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:32:59AM -0800, Sean Wang wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:49:26PM -0800, Sean Wang wrote:
quoted
Nicholas Mc Guire [off-list ref] ??? 2018???11???21??? ?????? ??????10:13?????????
quoted
The error cases of mediatek_gpio_bank_probe() would go unnoticed (except
for the dev_err() messages). The probe function should return an error
if one of the banks failed to initialize properly.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <redacted>
Fixes: 4ba9c3afda41 ("gpio: mt7621: Add a driver for MT7621")
---

Patch was compile tested with: omega2p_defconfig, SOC_MT7621=y,
GPIOLIB=y, GPIO_MT7621=y

Patch is against 4.20-rc3 (localversion-next is next-20181121)

 drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c
index 1ec95bc..68fca8b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ mediatek_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
        struct mtk *mtk;
        int i;
+       int ret;

        mtk = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mtk), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!mtk)
@@ -311,8 +312,11 @@ mediatek_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtk);
        mediatek_gpio_irq_chip.name = dev_name(dev);

-       for (i = 0; i < MTK_BANK_CNT; i++)
-               mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(dev, np, i);
+       for (i = 0; i < MTK_BANK_CNT; i++) {
+               ret = mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(dev, np, i);
+               if (!ret)
it should be if (ret < 0) ?
I don?t think so mediatek_gpio_bank_probe() returns 0 on success
and all other returns are error paths - while the current code
only returns negative values I do thik that any non 0 would be
an error indication so !ret should be fine here.
!0 would be true
...sorry - stupid me - thanks for catching that !

thx!
hofrat
 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help