Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2018-10-22

[Freedreno] [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add gpu and gmu device nodes

From: Niklas Cassel <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-22 13:20:27
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-pm

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 15-10-18, 08:34, Jordan Crouse wrote:
quoted
I agree that consistency is good. But the GPU is by design outside of the
control of the genpd universe so it is by design not using the same features.
It unfortunately does happen to use a similar number in an OPP binding to
construct the level mapping but since we can't read the cmd-db from the GMU
space this is a necessary evil.
Where do you define how to use this binding in case of GPU? I mean
some DT binding doc must have some information to avoid confusion as
all other users will have the qcom,level thing in the genpd's OPP
table which GPU will have it directly within its OPP table.
Jordan suggested to use the RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_* defines.
These are defined in include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h.

This header is only referenced in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
(Which this patch series does not seem to use.)

This patch series does use
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/qcom-opp.txt
but it does not reference include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h.

So to further avoid confusion, perhaps it is better to create new
defines, instead of reusing the RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_* defines?


Kind regards,
Niklas
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help