[PATCH v10 4/5] clk: imx: add imx composite clock
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
Date: 2018-10-10 05:38:00
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 10:56:14PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:
On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 08:37 +0000, Abel Vesa wrote:quoted
+struct clk *imx_clk_composite_8m_flags(const char *name, + const char **parent_names, + int num_parents, void __iomem *reg, + unsigned long flags); + +#define __imx_clk_composite_8m(name, parent_names, reg, flags) \ + imx_clk_composite_8m_flags(name, parent_names, \ + ARRAY_SIZE(parent_names), reg, \ + flags | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE) + +#define imx_clk_composite_8m(name, parent_names, reg) \ + __imx_clk_composite_8m(name, parent_names, reg, 0) + +#define imx_clk_composite_8m_critical(name, parent_names, reg) \ + __imx_clk_composite_8m(name, parent_names, reg, CLK_IS_CRITICAL)Does anyone else think that the "8m" would be prettier next to imx rather than as a suffix? Using imx8m_clk_composite* and imx7ulp_clk_composite* makes more sense to me.
+1 Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |