[PATCH v5 01/27] arm64: cpufeature: Set SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF as a boot system feature
From: Yao Lihua <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-25 03:10:10
Hi Marc, Julien? On 09/21/2018 11:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:51:11 +0100, Julien Thierry [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <redacted> Suggested-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <redacted> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted> --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index e238b79..1e433ac 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ static void cpu_has_fwb(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused) { .desc = "GIC system register CPU interface", .capability = ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF, - .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE, + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE, .matches = has_useable_gicv3_cpuif, .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, .field_pos = ID_AA64PFR0_GIC_SHIFT,-- 1.9.1This definitely deserves a commit message, such as: "We do not support systems where some CPUs have an operational GICv3 CPU interface, and some don't. Let's make this requirement obvious by flagging the GICv3 capability as being strict."
May I ask if it is possible to implement psedue-NMI on a arm64 SoC with GIC-400?
Thanks, M.
Best Regards, Lihua