On 05/09/2018 12:29, Auger Eric wrote:

quoted

+/**
+ * iommu_sva_bind_device() - Bind a process address space to a device
+ * @dev: the device
+ * @mm: the mm to bind, caller must hold a reference to it
+ * @pasid: valid address where the PASID will be stored
+ * @flags: bond properties
+ * @drvdata: private data passed to the mm exit handler
+ *
+ * Create a bond between device and task, allowing the device to access the mm
+ * using the returned PASID. If unbind() isn't called first, a subsequent bind()
+ * for the same device and mm fails with -EEXIST.
+ *
+ * iommu_sva_device_init() must be called first, to initialize the required SVA
+ * features. @flags is a subset of these features.

@flags must be a subset of these features?

Ok

don't you want to check flags is a subset of
dev->iommu_param->sva_param->features?

Yes, that will be in next version

quoted

+/**
+ * iommu_sva_unbind_device() - Remove a bond created with iommu_sva_bind_device
+ * @dev: the device
+ * @pasid: the pasid returned by bind()
+ *
+ * Remove bond between device and address space identified by @pasid. Users
+ * should not call unbind() if the corresponding mm exited (as the PASID might
+ * have been reallocated for another process).
+ *
+ * The device must not be issuing any more transaction for this PASID. All
+ * outstanding page requests for this PASID must have been flushed to the IOMMU.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success, or an error value
+ */
+int iommu_sva_unbind_device(struct device *dev, int pasid)

returned value needed?

I'd rather keep this one, since it already pointed out some of my bugs
during regression testing.

Thanks,
Jean