omap4: support for manually updated display
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-11 12:54:32
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-omap, lkml
Hi!
quoted
quoted
A large omapdrm change set from Laurent was merged into drm-next, and I'm certain they conflict with this series. Laurent also has continued that work, and while those new patches haven't been sent for review yet, I fear they'll also conflict with these. So in the minimum, a rebase on top of drm-next is needed. I also continue to be very worried that adding DSI support to omapdrm at this stage will be a huge extra burden for Laurent's work. We should transform the panel-dsi-cm.c towards the common DRM model. With a quick look, there seems to be a driver for Samsung's S6E63J0X03 panel. So possibly all the DSI features are there in the DRM framework, but someone needs to check that and start working on panel-dsi-cm.c so that it's ready when we finally switch to the DRM model. In my opinion, which I've also expressed before, the above work is much easier to do by first changing the omapdrm to DRM model, without any DSI displays, and then add the DSI command mode support. But if people insist on adding the DSI support already now, I would appreciate the same people working on the DSI support so that Laurent doesn't have to do it all.I want to make it clear that I don't want to claim any privilege in getting patches merged first. I am however worried that, without an easy way to test DSI support, and without enough time to focus on it, I would break whatever would be merged now in future reworks. I would thus like to find out how to collaborate on this task, hopefully to move towards usage of drm_bridge and drm_panel for DSI-based pipelines.I'm currently quite busy and barely find enough time to do my work as power-supply subsystem maintainer, but I already started to rebase the series. I agree, that it would be very nice to move towards usage of common DRM framework(s), but it's also nice to see which patch breaks DSI ;)
I was thinking of doing rebase myself... so if you need some help, or run out of a time and will need someone to finish it, let me know. Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180911/1361818d/attachment.sig>