Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 3 authors, 2018-09-10

[PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users

From: Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-10 10:02:16
Also in: linux-doc, lkml


On 10/09/18 09:24, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
The API changes change so many things, that these series would be
incompatible. I can send the series separately but they would be
co-dependent anyway. Does it sound good?
What am asking is to reorder the patches in a such a way that its easy 
to review.
ex: Order can be :
1> kref and update nvmem_unregister followed by the provider changes.
2> Add support to cell tables, cell lookup, notifier
3> general cleanup patches  followed by fixes

Current set seems to jump from one thing to other which makes it hard to 
follow and time consuming while review!


--srini
Bart
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help