[PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-10 10:02:16
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-10 10:02:16
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml
On 10/09/18 09:24, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
The API changes change so many things, that these series would be incompatible. I can send the series separately but they would be co-dependent anyway. Does it sound good?
What am asking is to reorder the patches in a such a way that its easy to review. ex: Order can be : 1> kref and update nvmem_unregister followed by the provider changes. 2> Add support to cell tables, cell lookup, notifier 3> general cleanup patches followed by fixes Current set seems to jump from one thing to other which makes it hard to follow and time consuming while review! --srini
Bart