Properly place the "fall through" annotations at the bottom of the case,
which is what GCC is expecting to find.
This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1222851 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 402011 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
---
drivers/net/can/at91_can.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
index d98c690..1718c20 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
@@ -902,7 +902,8 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev,
CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING :
CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
}
- case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: /* fallthrough */
+ /* fall through */
+ case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
/*
* from: ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING
* to : ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF
@@ -951,7 +952,8 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev,
netdev_dbg(dev, "Error Active\n");
cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT;
cf->data[2] = CAN_ERR_PROT_ACTIVE;
- case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: /* fallthrough */
+ /* fall through */
+ case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
reg_idr = AT91_IRQ_ERRA | AT91_IRQ_WARN | AT91_IRQ_BOFF;
reg_ier = AT91_IRQ_ERRP;
break;
--
2.7.4