[PATCH] EDAC, ghes: use CPER module handles to locate DIMMs
From: tanxiaofei <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-31 10:06:13
Also in:
linux-edac, lkml
On 2018/8/31 0:50, John Garry wrote:
On 30/08/2018 17:34, James Morse wrote: Hi James, Zhengqiang no longer works on this topic, so I have cc'ed some more guys who should be able to help. Johnquoted
Hi Zhengqiang, On 29/08/18 19:33, Fan Wu wrote:quoted
The current ghes_edac driver does not update per-dimm error counters when reporting memory errors, because there is no platform-independent way to find DIMMs based on the error information provided by firmware. This patch offers a solution for platforms whose firmwares provide valid module handles (SMBIOS type 17) in error records. In this case ghes_edac will use the module handles to locate DIMMs and thus makes per-dimm error reporting possible.Does your platform set CPER_MEM_VALID_MODULE_HANDLE in GHES Memory errors? If so, any chance you could test this patch on your platform? [0] (original patch: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/978928/)
Hi James, Our platform do not set CPER_MEM_VALID_MODULE_HANDLE in GHES Memory errors. Thanks, tanxiaofei
quoted
Thanks, James [0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-edac&m=152603960002324quoted
diff --git a/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c index 473aeec..db527f0 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c@@ -81,6 +81,26 @@ static void ghes_edac_count_dimms(const struct dmi_header *dh, void *arg) (*num_dimm)++; } +static int ghes_edac_dimm_index(u16 handle) +{ + struct mem_ctl_info *mci; + int i; + + if (!ghes_pvt) + return -1; + + mci = ghes_pvt->mci; + + if (!mci) + return -1; + + for (i = 0; i < mci->tot_dimms; i++) { + if (mci->dimms[i]->smbios_handle == handle) + return i; + } + return -1; +} + static void ghes_edac_dmidecode(const struct dmi_header *dh, void *arg) { struct ghes_edac_dimm_fill *dimm_fill = arg;@@ -177,6 +197,8 @@ static void ghes_edac_dmidecode(const struct dmi_header *dh, void *arg) entry->total_width, entry->data_width); } + dimm->smbios_handle = entry->handle; + dimm_fill->count++; } }@@ -327,12 +349,20 @@ void ghes_edac_report_mem_error(int sev, struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err) p += sprintf(p, "bit_pos:%d ", mem_err->bit_pos); if (mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_MODULE_HANDLE) { const char *bank = NULL, *device = NULL; + int index = -1; + dmi_memdev_name(mem_err->mem_dev_handle, &bank, &device); + p += sprintf(p, "DIMM DMI handle: 0x%.4x ", + mem_err->mem_dev_handle); if (bank != NULL && device != NULL) p += sprintf(p, "DIMM location:%s %s ", bank, device); - else - p += sprintf(p, "DIMM DMI handle: 0x%.4x ", - mem_err->mem_dev_handle); + + index = ghes_edac_dimm_index(mem_err->mem_dev_handle); + if (index >= 0) { + e->top_layer = index; + e->enable_per_layer_report = true; + } + } if (p > e->location) *(p - 1) = '\0';diff --git a/include/linux/edac.h b/include/linux/edac.h index bffb978..a45ce1f 100644 --- a/include/linux/edac.h +++ b/include/linux/edac.h@@ -451,6 +451,8 @@ struct dimm_info { u32 nr_pages; /* number of pages on this dimm */ unsigned csrow, cschannel; /* Points to the old API data */ + + u16 smbios_handle; /* Handle for SMBIOS type 17 */ }; /**..
-- best wishes ???