Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2018-08-30

[PATCH] perf annotate: fix parsing aarch64 branch instructions after objdump update

From: Kim Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-24 21:45:11
Also in: linux-perf-users, lkml

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:59:22 +0200
Thomas-Mich Richter [off-list ref] wrote:
On 08/24/2018 02:10 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
quoted
Tested no difference in output for sample x86_64, power arch perf.data files.
Tested,  no difference in output on s390. Just to let you know.
Thanks!  An official Tested-by: tag would help keep acme from guessing
whether he should convert these less-officially sounding types of
emails in the future.  I doubt your official Tested-by implies you
necessarily have had to claim you fully tested it on e.g., x86-64, esp.
if your Tested-by is in such context as provided above.

BTW, if you want to send me an s390 perf.data file and the file
resulting from 'perf archive', and a matching vmlinux in an off-list
email, I can add it to my perf-archives arsenal for future testing.

Again, thanks for testing!

Kim
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help