[PATCH] perf annotate: fix parsing aarch64 branch instructions after objdump update
From: Kim Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-24 21:45:11
Also in:
linux-perf-users, lkml
From: Kim Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-24 21:45:11
Also in:
linux-perf-users, lkml
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:59:22 +0200 Thomas-Mich Richter [off-list ref] wrote:
On 08/24/2018 02:10 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:quoted
Tested no difference in output for sample x86_64, power arch perf.data files.Tested, no difference in output on s390. Just to let you know.
Thanks! An official Tested-by: tag would help keep acme from guessing whether he should convert these less-officially sounding types of emails in the future. I doubt your official Tested-by implies you necessarily have had to claim you fully tested it on e.g., x86-64, esp. if your Tested-by is in such context as provided above. BTW, if you want to send me an s390 perf.data file and the file resulting from 'perf archive', and a matching vmlinux in an off-list email, I can add it to my perf-archives arsenal for future testing. Again, thanks for testing! Kim