[RESEND PATCH v10 1/6] arm: arm64: introduce CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID
From: Jia He <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-20 06:27:37
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 8/17/2018 10:50 PM, Catalin Marinas Wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 05:01:10PM +0800, Jia He wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 42c090c..26d75f4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig@@ -778,6 +778,10 @@ config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM +config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID + def_bool y + depends on HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID + config HW_PERF_EVENTS def_bool y depends on ARM_PMUdiff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig index 94af022..28fcf54 100644 --- a/mm/Kconfig +++ b/mm/Kconfig@@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP bool +config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID + boolSince you defined HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID here, do we need to define it in the arch code as well? If kept it in the mm/Kconfig only, you could just select it in the arch HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID entry:
Ok, thanks for the comments It makes it more clean. -- Cheers, Jia
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index d0a53cc6293a..cd230c77e122 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig@@ -787,6 +787,7 @@ config ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM + select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID config HW_PERF_EVENTS def_bool y(similarly for arch/arm)