Thread (40 messages) 40 messages, 6 authors, 2018-11-12
STALE2770d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)
Revisions (6)
  1. v2 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 current
  3. v2 [diff vs current]
  4. v2 [diff vs current]
  5. v2 [diff vs current]
  6. v2 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

From: Peter Rosin <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-31 07:53:57
Also in: dri-devel

On 2018-07-31 09:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:44:24AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
quoted
On 2018-07-30 18:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
Hi,

This is a re-posting of the series I responded to Peter Rosin's May
posting, with a few bugs fixed, and the bridge registered outside of
the component helper.  This should allow Peter to use the driver
while maintaining armada drm and tilcdc support.

No comments (other than 0-day test results) were received on the
previous posting.
I of course meant to comment on this! I didn't because there was a rush
before vacation, then vacation, then a heap of important stuff that had
piled up. This one simply had too low priority to make a significant bleep
on the radar. Sorry for the silence...

However, now that I do try to test, I get conflicts as I try to apply the
patches. I'm wondering what this was based on? I've tried next-20180730
drm-misc/drm-misc-next from some minutes ago.
They're based on 4.17.
Right, meanwhile I massaged the patches into a combo of some local patches,
next-20180730 and drm-misc-next, and tested that. The conflict was trivial
once I had a closer look...

And it seems to work (with atmel-hlcdc), so you can add

Tested-by: Peter Rosin <redacted>

Thank you for very much for picking this up!

Cheers,
Peter
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help