Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2018-07-22
STALE2872d

[PATCH] ARM: dts: rmobile: Drop MTD partitioning from DT

From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
Date: 2018-07-21 22:11:33
Also in: linux-renesas-soc

On 07/22/2018 12:01 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Marek Vasut [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 07/21/2018 11:47 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
quoted
Hi,
Hi,
quoted
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:11 AM, Marek Vasut [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Drop the MTD partitioning from DT, since it does not describe HW
and to give way to a more flexible kernel command line partition
passing.

To retain the original partitioning, assure you have enabled
CONFIG_MTD_CMDLINE_PARTS in your kernel config and add the
following to your kernel command line:

lager:   mtdparts=spi0.0:256k(loader),4m(user),-(flash)
stout:   mtdparts=spi0.0:512k(loader),256k(uboot),256k(uboot-env),-(flash)
koelsch: mtdparts=spi0.0:512k(loader),5632k(user),-(flash)
porter:  mtdparts=spi0.0:256k(loader_prg),4m(user_prg),-(flash_fs)
wheat:   mtdparts=spi0.0:256k(loader),4m(user),-(flash)
gose:    mtdparts=spi0.0:256k(loader),4m(user),-(flash)
alt:     mtdparts=spi0.0:256k(loader),256k(system),-(user)
silk:    mtdparts=spi0.0:256k(loader),4m(user),-(flash)
Having to specify on command line is such a nasty hack. I wish we
could remove that, and at the very least not add it for anything new.
Do you have a better suggestion ?
Yes, keep it in DT.
See below
quoted
quoted
You end up with user space tools trying to parse the kernel command
line to figure out what's on the flash, and other really bad habits.
:(
You should just read /proc/mtd , see
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/general.html
Sure, I know that but not everybody does, and they do it in bad ways
if given the opportunity.
That's what the documentation is for. I assume whoever is using MTD is
also capable of reading the documentation and thus avoiding such basic
mistakes.
quoted
quoted
I'd strongly advice you to keep this in the board files, unless you
have an actual real motivation for changing it. This patch does not
provide one.
Partitioning is not hardware description, it should not be in DT.
Read my reply again. It's part of _platform_ description, and belongs in DT.
I can repartition the flash whichever way I want for my purposes, just
like I can repartition a harddrive. We don't have harddrive partitioning
in the DT, why should we have flash partitioning there ? How do those
differ ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help