Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2018-07-05

Self-detected stall on CPU when using SD card

From: aisheng.dong@nxp.com (A.s. Dong)
Date: 2018-07-05 03:13:50
Also in: linux-mmc

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Agner [mailto:stefan at agner.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 9:13 PM
To: adrian.hunter at intel.com; A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>; Fabio
Estevam [off-list ref]
Cc: linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
mmc-owner at vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Self-detected stall on CPU when using SD card

Dong Aisheng,

Maybe you can shed some light on the issue below?
I tried on MX6Q SDB board but did not reproduce it with a SD card
plugged into Slot2 with 4.18-rc1.
Any difference we need to care?
On 26.06.2018 16:45, Stefan Agner wrote:
quoted
On 26.06.2018 12:53, Stefan Agner wrote:
quoted
Hi,

On our Colibri iMX6 (arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-colibri.dtsi) we
experience the following stack trace when a SD card is plugged in:
[...]
quoted
[<c08396f4>] (esdhc_pltfm_set_clock) from [<c083622c>]
(sdhci_set_ios+0xd8/0x584)
 r10:ffffe000 r9:c1105900 r8:00004097 r7:d818f2e8 r6:d818f480
r5:d818f2e8
 r4:d818f000
[<c0836154>] (sdhci_set_ios) from [<c0836070>]
(sdhci_runtime_resume_host+0xa0/0x184)
 r9:c1105900 r8:00004097 r7:d818f2e8 r6:d818f648 r5:d818f000
r4:d818f480
[...]
quoted
It used to work in v4.9, so I started a git bisect. It pointed me to
this commit:

Commit d1e4f74f911d ("mmc: sdhci: Do not use spin lock in set_ios
paths").

Reverting the commit on-top of v4.18-rc1 seems to fix the issue too.

Any idea?
I figured out that the same platform had a GPIO Key which triggered
all the time. This seems to exacerbate the MMC issue such that it
triggers on very boot, about rootfs mount time.
That's a bit strange.... Why that GPIO key triggers all the time?
quoted
This change seems to fix the issue as well, not sure though whether
this is a proper fix:
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct
sdhci_host *host,
        int ddr_pre_div = imx_data->is_ddr ? 2 : 1;
        int pre_div = 1;
        int div = 1;
+       unsigned long flags;
        u32 temp, val;

        if (clock == 0) {
@@ -724,6 +725,7 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct
sdhci_host *host,
                        pre_div = 2;
        }

+       spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
        temp = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL);
        temp &= ~(ESDHC_CLOCK_IPGEN | ESDHC_CLOCK_HCKEN |
ESDHC_CLOCK_PEREN
                | ESDHC_CLOCK_MASK);
@@ -754,6 +756,7 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct
sdhci_host *host,
                writel(val | ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON,
                host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
        }
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
The bits ESDHC_CLOCK_IPGEN, ESDHC_CLOCK_HCKEN,
ESDHC_CLOCK_PEREN which are cleared and written in that section are
actually mentioned as "Reserved. Always write as 1." in the reference
manual...
That's for legacy platforms like MX5. No side affect on MX6&7 as we know.
So keep it now. Is the issue related to that?

Regards
Dong Aisheng
--
Stefan
quoted
        mdelay(1);
 }

--
Stefan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help