Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2018-08-13

[PATCH 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Error out only if not enough context interrupts

From: Vivek Gautam <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-27 09:57:38
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, lkml

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:09:41PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
quoted
On 7/24/2018 2:06 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:23:56PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 7c69736a30f8..4cb53bf4f423 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -2229,12 +2229,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   if (err)
           return err;
-   if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2 &&
-       smmu->num_context_banks != smmu->num_context_irqs) {
-           dev_err(dev,
-                   "found only %d context interrupt(s) but %d required\n",
-                   smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
-           return -ENODEV;
+   if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2) {
+           if (smmu->num_context_banks > smmu->num_context_irqs) {
+                   dev_err(dev,
+                         "found only %d context irq(s) but %d required\n",
+                         smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
+                   return -ENODEV;
+           } else if (smmu->num_context_banks < smmu->num_context_irqs) {
+                   /* loose extra context interrupts */
+                   dev_notice(dev,
+                         "found %d context irq(s) but only %d required\n",
+                         smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
+                   smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
+           }
I don't see the utility in the new message. Can you simplify with the patch
below on top? It's a bit weird that we only decide to ignore the extra irqs
after calling platform_get_irq() on them, but that seems to be harmless.
Thanks. I will modify as suggested below and respin.
It's ok, I can make the change locally.
Thanks Will for making the changes, and picking this.

Best regards
Vivek

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help