Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2018-08-10

[PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

From: dianders@chromium.org (Doug Anderson)
Date: 2018-07-23 20:09:11
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:50 PM, David Collins [off-list ref] wrote:
Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some
Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs.  These devices allow a given
processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which
are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests
from other processors in the SoC to determine the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.

Signed-off-by: David Collins <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
 .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt     | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++
 .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h    |  36 +++++
 2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
I know you are still looking for time to review the RPMh-regulator
driver and that's fine.  One idea I had though: if the bindings look
OK to you and are less controversial, is there any chance they could
land in the meantime?

Specifically it would be very handy to be able to post up device tree
files that refer to regulators and even get those landed, but they
can't land without the bindings.

If that's not possible then no worries, but I figured I'd check.


-Doug
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help