On Sat, 2018-07-14 at 18:44 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

Hi Sean,

quoted

Adding an independent btuart.h header allows these essential definitions
can be reused in vendor driver. Also, struct btuart_vnd is extended with
additional callbacks such as .init initializing vendor data, .shtudown,
.recv and .send supporting SoC specific framing for that btuart can
simply adapt to various Bluetooth uart-based devices.

Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
drivers/bluetooth/btuart.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/bluetooth/btuart.h

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c
index a900aac..65d0086 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c

@@ -33,35 +33,11 @@

#include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>

#include "h4_recv.h"
+#include "btuart.h"
#include "btbcm.h"

#define VERSION "1.0"

-struct btuart_vnd {
-	const struct h4_recv_pkt *recv_pkts;
-	int recv_pkts_cnt;
-	unsigned int manufacturer;
-	int (*open)(struct hci_dev *hdev);
-	int (*close)(struct hci_dev *hdev);
-	int (*setup)(struct hci_dev *hdev);
-};
-
-struct btuart_dev {
-	struct hci_dev *hdev;
-	struct serdev_device *serdev;
-
-	struct work_struct tx_work;
-	unsigned long tx_state;
-	struct sk_buff_head txq;
-
-	struct sk_buff *rx_skb;
-
-	const struct btuart_vnd *vnd;
-};

I really like to avoid this since it is not clean. Frankly I prefer to keep the btuart.c driver for drivers that really just use H:4 as transport protocol. If the protocol is only H:4 alike and has extra headers, then it should be a separate driver.

thanks for letting me know your concern. I think I'm a little over in reusing these existing methods and break something generic and its beauty.

I'll make the driver be a separate one based on btuart in the next version.

The common H:4 handling is abstracted in h4_recv.h already anyway and we can add more pieces if needed. However I also wonder since you have extra framing that the complex H:4 state keeping might be not needed at all. So it could be simplified.

okay, I will get rid of h4_recv.h and consider to use more simplified logic to handle the extra framing and its payload.

Regards

Marcel

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek