[PATCH v3 3/3] serial: 8250_dw: add fractional divisor support
From: Jisheng Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-10 02:09:15
Also in:
linux-serial, lkml
Hi Andy, On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:32:41 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Hi Andy, On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:23:15 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:quoted
For Synopsys DesignWare 8250 uart which version >= 4.00a, there's a valid divisor latch fraction register. The fractional divisor width is 4bits ~ 6bits. Now the preparation is done, it's easy to add the feature support. This patch firstly tries to get the fractional divisor width during probe, then setups dw specific get_divisor() and set_divisor() hook. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <redacted> --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c index fa8a00e8c9c6..e90c3d229f00 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ /* Offsets for the DesignWare specific registers */ #define DW_UART_USR 0x1f /* UART Status Register */ +#define DW_UART_DLF 0xc0 /* Divisor Latch Fraction Register */ #define DW_UART_CPR 0xf4 /* Component Parameter Register */ #define DW_UART_UCV 0xf8 /* UART Component Version */@@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ struct dw8250_data { u8 usr_reg; + u8 dlf_size; int line; int msr_mask_on; int msr_mask_off;@@ -366,6 +368,37 @@ static bool dw8250_idma_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param) return param == chan->device->dev->parent; } +/* + * divisor = clk / (16 * baud) = div(I) + div(F) + * "I" means integer, "F" means fractional + * + * 2^dlf_size * clk / (16 * baud) = 2^dlf_size * (div(I) + div(F)) + * so, (clk << (dlf_siz - 4)) / baud = (div(I) + div(F)) << dlf_size + * + * let quot = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clk << (dlf_size - 4), baud), we get + * div(I) = quot >> dlf_size + * div(F) = quot & dlf_mask, where dlf_mask = GENMASK(dlf_size - 1, 0) + */ +static unsigned int dw8250_get_divisor(struct uart_port *p, + unsigned int baud, + unsigned int *frac) +{ + unsigned int quot; + struct dw8250_data *d = p->private_data; + + quot = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(p->uartclk << (d->dlf_size - 4), baud); + *frac = quot & GENMASK(d->dlf_size - 1, 0); + + return quot >> d->dlf_size;After more consideration, I sent out this version for the following two points: 1. the max frac divisor width is 6bits now, but we dunno whether future IP extends it or not. This patch version can still support > 6bits width except the overflow concern. But fixing overflow(if there is) is as simple as using\ the DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL macro. 2. this version makes use of well implemented GENMASK to get the dlf_mask, the micro is well understood, I think. so the code is simplified as well. 3. the magic "4" is explained in the comments, I hope it could help the code.
I agree with your "making the code simple" concern. So I have a consideration
again. I think I made the code complex unnecessarily, the simplest get_divisor code
could be:
get_divisor()
{
unsigned int quot, rem;
quot = clk / (16 * baud);
rem = clk % (16 *baud);
*frac = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rem << dlf_size, 16*baud);
return quot;
}
Compared with previous version, this one adds one more div instruction,
but remove several "shift, and" instructions, the performance isn't that bad.From another side, even this version gets a trivial performance regression,
the get_divisor() doesn't sit on the hot code path. Making the code simpler is more important. I will send a new version. Thanks