Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2018-07-11

[PATCH v4 1/6] driver core: allow stopping deferred probe after init

From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: 2018-07-09 15:52:31
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 09:41:48AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
Deferred probe will currently wait forever on dependent devices to probe,
but sometimes a driver will never exist. It's also not always critical for
a driver to exist. Platforms can rely on default configuration from the
bootloader or reset defaults for things such as pinctrl and power domains.
This is often the case with initial platform support until various drivers
get enabled. There's at least 2 scenarios where deferred probe can render
a platform broken. Both involve using a DT which has more devices and
dependencies than the kernel supports. The 1st case is a driver may be
disabled in the kernel config. The 2nd case is the kernel version may
simply not have the dependent driver. This can happen if using a newer DT
(provided by firmware perhaps) with a stable kernel version. Deferred
probe issues can be difficult to debug especially if the console has
dependencies or userspace fails to boot to a shell.

There are also cases like IOMMUs where only built-in drivers are
supported, so deferring probe after initcalls is not needed. The IOMMU
subsystem implemented its own mechanism to handle this using OF_DECLARE
linker sections.

This commit adds makes ending deferred probe conditional on initcalls
being completed or a debug timeout. Subsystems or drivers may opt-in by
calling driver_deferred_probe_check_init_done() instead of
unconditionally returning -EPROBE_DEFER. They may use additional
information from DT or kernel's config to decide whether to continue to
defer probe or not.

The timeout mechanism is intended for debug purposes and WARNs loudly.
The remaining deferred probe pending list will also be dumped after the
timeout. Not that this timeout won't work for the console which needs
to be enabled before userspace starts. However, if the console's
dependencies are resolved, then the kernel log will be printed (as
opposed to no output).
So what happens if we have a set of modules which use deferred probing
in order to work?

For example, with sound stuff built as modules, and auto-loaded in
parallel by udev, the modules get added in a random order.  The
modules have non-udev obvious dependencies between them (resource
dependencies) which result in deferred probing being necessary to
bring the device up.

Eg,

snd_soc_kirkwood_spdif module declares the ASoC card.
snd_soc_spdif_tx is a codec as a loadable module.
snd_soc_kirkwood is the CPU digital audio interface module.

What I commonly see is this module load order:

snd_soc_kirkwood_spdif, then snd_soc_kirkwood and then snd_soc_spdif_tx.

This results at boot in:

kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: ASoC: CPU DAI kirkwood-fe not registered
kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: ASoC: CPU DAI kirkwood-fe not registered
kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: ASoC: CPU DAI kirkwood-fe not registered
kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: ASoC: CPU DAI kirkwood-fe not registered
kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: ASoC: CPU DAI kirkwood-fe not registered
kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: ASoC: CODEC DAI dit-hifi not registered
kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: ASoC: CODEC DAI dit-hifi not registered
kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: snd-soc-dummy-dai <-> kirkwood-fe mapping ok
kirkwood-spdif-audio audio-subsystem: multicodec <-> kirkwood-spdif mapping ok

at boot, where most of these are deferred probe attempts.

So, disabling deferred probing after all the kernel-internal initcalls
are run is wrong.  You can have deferred probing required due to
external modules, and this can kick in at any time (think about
hot-pluggable hardware with a driver that's somehow componentised,
like an audio device...)

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 13.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 13Mbps down 490kbps up
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help