On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 07:23:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:40:49PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
* The fallbacks are not expected to change very often, and are not
affected by machine details or configuration options, so regenerating
them for *every* build is somewhat wasteful.
Except of course, your last patch in this series now does exactly that
:-)
Second-last, but agreed. ;)
I'll reword this to:
* The fallbacks are not affected by machine details or configuration options,
so it is not necessary to regenerate them to take these into account.
Thanks,
Mark.