Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 8 authors, 2018-07-27

[PATCH v4 08/18] net: davinci_emac: potentially get the MAC address from MTD

From: Sekhar Nori <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-04 09:06:02
Also in: linux-omap, lkml, netdev

On Wednesday 04 July 2018 01:59 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
2018-07-04 9:09 GMT+02:00 Ladislav Michl [off-list ref]:
quoted
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:39:51AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted

On 06/29/2018 02:40 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
quoted
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>

On da850-evm board we can read the MAC address from MTD. It's currently
done in the relevant board file, but we want to get rid of all the MAC
reading callbacks from the board file (SPI and NAND). Move the reading
of the MAC address from SPI to the emac driver's probe function.
This should be made something generic to all drivers, not just something
the davinci_emac driver does, something like this actually:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/24/312
...and that's would also make it work when MAC address is stored
in 24c08 EEPROM, which is quite common.
This is what the second patch for davinci_emac in this series does. I
agree that this should become more generic at some point - we should
probably have a routine somewhere in net that would try to get the MAC
address from all possible sources (nvmem, of etc.). This is somewhat
related to the work I want to do on nvmem to make the at24 setup()
callback more generic.

Unfortunately we don't have it yet and I will not have time to work on
it before v4.20 so if there are no serious objections, I'd like to get
this series merged for v4.19 and then we can refactor the MAC reading
later.

How does it sound?
I don't think the series introduces any regressions. We need to have MTD
and SPI flash built into the kernel even today to get mac address on
DA850 EVM. So from that perspective, I don't have objections (I need to
actually test still).

OTOH, it will be nice to do the conversion once and not piecemeal. That
way there is less churn and scope for regressions.

So from a mach-davinci perspective, I don't have a very strong position
either way.

Thanks,
Sekhar
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help