Hi David,

On Monday 02 July 2018 09:02 PM, David Lechner wrote:

On 07/02/2018 07:28 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:

quoted

Hi David, Stephen,

On Thursday 28 June 2018 03:27 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

quoted

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>

This series moves all aemif/nand users to using the ti-aemif platform
driver located in drivers/memory instead of the older API located in
mach-davinci.

First five patches add necessary changes to the clock driver. Next
seven convert the board files to using the ti-aemif driver. Last patch
removes now dead code.

How do you want to handle this series? I can apply the series and
provide you an immutable branch on v4.18-rc1 with the clock patches
applied if that can work.

Sounds good to me. But I'm new to this maintainer thing, so maybe
there is something to consider that I haven't thought of?

I don't think there is more to it. Ultimately there should not be two
commits for the same patch. Either you can apply and share the commit to
use or I can do that as well. I am equally fine either way.

Regards,
Sekhar