Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2018-06-19

next/master boot: 138 boots: 8 failed, 112 passed with 18 offline (next-20180619)

From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
Date: 2018-06-19 14:57:41
Also in: linux-next, linux-rockchip

quoted
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 07:00:13AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:

Today and yesterday's -next is failing to boot on rk3399-firefly in two

configs:
quoted
    defconfig:
        rk3399-firefly:
            lab-baylibre-seattle: failing since 1 day (last pass:
            next-20180615 - first fail: next-20180618)>>     
    defconfig+CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y:
        rk3399-firefly:
            lab-baylibre-seattle: failing since 1 day (last pass:
            next-20180615 - first fail: next-20180618)> 
The log ends with:

[    2.629278] SWITCH_REG2: supplied by vcc3v3_sys
[    2.633030] fan53555-regulator 0-0040: FAN53555 Option[8] Rev[1]
Detected! [    2.633723] fan53555-reg: supplied by vcc_sys
[    2.6353|] Internal error: undefined instruction: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP

which is rather entertaining.
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2018, 16:41:43 CEST schrieb Mark Brown:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 03:22:47PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
quoted
Based on the logs from successful boots, I see it's CPUFreq that gets
probed after fan53555-reg. I also see that it warns about unlisted OPPs
in the successful boots. I guess, the undefined instruction could occur
if there's issue with CPU DVFS(under voltage or frequency that's not
supported). I don't have much knowledge on the platform, I am just
guessing on the possible cause here.
Yeah, that was my guess - either an out of spec voltage/frequency was
selected or the regulator isn't able to keep up with the voltage
transition or a load spike and the power browns out.
I guess this is related to
	arm64: dts: rockchip: correct voltage selector Firefly-RK3399 [0]

which is in so far interesting as the patch seems to fix a similar issue
to the above with the opposite "fcs,suspend-voltage-selector" value.
And also claims to be in line with the vendor kernel.
From looking at the schematics, we might have a discrepancy between the
fcs,suspend-voltage-selector and vsel input-pin leading to a gpio
[likely depending on what the bootloader set this pin up for].

I'll drop the patch for now and get in contact with the patch submitter.


Heiko

[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10447075/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help