[PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: actions: Add interrupt support for OWL S900 SoC
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-03 08:37:57
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, lkml
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-03 08:37:57
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, lkml
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam [off-list ref] wrote:
Add interrupt support for Actions Semi OWL S900 SoC.
+ port = owl_gpio_get_port(pctrl, &gpio); + if (WARN_ON(port == NULL)) + return;
At which circumstances the above possible?
+ port = owl_gpio_get_port(pctrl, &gpio); + if (WARN_ON(port == NULL)) + return;
Ditto.
+ port = owl_gpio_get_port(pctrl, &gpio); + if (WARN_ON(port == NULL)) + return;
Ditto.
+ port = owl_gpio_get_port(pctrl, &gpio); + if (WARN_ON(port == NULL)) + return -ENODEV;
Ditto.
+ for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
+ irqno = irq_create_mapping(pctrl->domain, i);
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irqno, &owl_gpio_irq_chip,
+ handle_edge_irq);
+ irq_set_chip_data(irqno, pctrl);
+ }I'm not sure the handle_edge_irq() is a correct handler here. It would be handle_bad_irq() until IRQ has been requested properly. No?
+/* GPIO TYPE Bit Definition */ +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_LEVEL_HIGH 0 +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_LEVEL_LOW 1 +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_EDGE_RISING 2 +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_EDGE_FALLING 3
+#define OWL_GPIO_INT_MASK 3
GENMASK? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko