[PATCH RFC 3/6] hwmon: Add support for RPi voltage sensor
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
Date: 2018-05-17 16:43:20
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-hwmon
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 09:59:01PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Hi Guenter,quoted
Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] hat am 16. Mai 2018 um 20:21 geschrieben: On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:37:04PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:quoted
Currently there is no easy way to detect under-voltage conditions on a remote Raspberry Pi. This hwmon driver retrieves the state of the under-voltage sensor via mailbox interface. The handling based on Noralf's modifications to the downstream firmware driver. In case of an under-voltage condition only an entry is written to the kernel log.My major concern is how this is displayed with the 'sensors' command. Can you test and report ?I get the following output: rpi_volt-isa-0000 Adapter: ISA adapter in0: N/A
Ok, that works.
quoted
Of course, it would be much better if the firmware would also report the actual voltage, but I guess we can't have everything.I think this isn't possible because the hardware only provide a binary value (GPIO).quoted
More comments inline. Thanks, Guenterquoted
CC: "Noralf Tr?nnes" <redacted> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <redacted> --- drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 10 ++ drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 + drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Please also provide Documentation/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.quoted
3 files changed, 218 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.cdiff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig index 768aed5..7f935cf 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig@@ -1298,6 +1298,16 @@ config SENSORS_PWM_FAN This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be called pwm-fan. +config SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON + tristate "Raspberry Pi voltage monitor" + depends on (ARCH_BCM2835 && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) || (COMPILE_TEST && !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) + help + If you say yes here you get support for voltage sensor on the + Raspberry Pi. + + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module + will be called raspberrypi-hwmon. + config SENSORS_SHT15 tristate "Sensiron humidity and temperature sensors. SHT15 and compat." depends on GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TESTdiff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile index e7d52a3..a929770 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87427) += pc87427.o obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8591) += pcf8591.o obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_POWR1220) += powr1220.o obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PWM_FAN) += pwm-fan.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON) += raspberrypi-hwmon.o obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_S3C) += s3c-hwmon.o obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH56XX_COMMON)+= sch56xx-common.o obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5627) += sch5627.odiff --git a/drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2003f6c --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +/* + * Raspberry Pi voltage sensor driver + * + * Based on firmware/raspberrypi.c by Noralf Tr?nnes + * + * Copyright (C) 2018 Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> + */ +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/hwmon.h> +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>Unnecessary includequoted
+#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/workqueue.h> +#include <soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h> + +#define UNDERVOLTAGE_STICKY_BIT BIT(16) + +struct rpi_hwmon_data { + struct device *hwmon_dev; + struct rpi_firmware *fw; + u32 last_throttled; + struct delayed_work get_values_poll_work; +}; + +static void rpi_firmware_get_throttled(struct rpi_hwmon_data *data) +{ + u32 new_uv, old_uv, value; + int ret; + + /* Clear sticky bits */Please make more explicit that this is a request/command sent to the firmware.quoted
+ value = 0xffff; + + ret = rpi_firmware_property(data->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_THROTTLED, + &value, sizeof(value)); + if (ret) { + dev_err_once(data->hwmon_dev, "%s: Failed to get throttled (%d)\n", + __func__, ret);The function name seems unnecessary.quoted
+ return; + } + + new_uv = value & UNDERVOLTAGE_STICKY_BIT; + old_uv = data->last_throttled & UNDERVOLTAGE_STICKY_BIT; + data->last_throttled = value; + + if (new_uv == old_uv) + return; + + if (new_uv) + dev_crit(data->hwmon_dev, "Under-voltage detected! (0x%08x)\n", + value); + else + dev_info(data->hwmon_dev, "Voltage normalised (0x%08x)\n", + value);What value do those hex values provide to the user ?The actual definition of the bits can be found in the commit log of patch #1. But this isn't very helpful for an end user.
I would suggest to drop the value from the log.
quoted
quoted
+ + sysfs_notify(&data->hwmon_dev->kobj, NULL, "in0_lcrit_alarm"); +} + +static void get_values_poll(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct rpi_hwmon_data *data; + + data = container_of(work, struct rpi_hwmon_data, + get_values_poll_work.work); + + rpi_firmware_get_throttled(data); + + /* + * We can't run faster than the sticky shift (100ms) since we get + * flipping in the sticky bits that are cleared. + */ + schedule_delayed_work(&data->get_values_poll_work, 2 * HZ); +} + +static int rpi_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type, + u32 attr, int channel, long *val) +{ + struct rpi_hwmon_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + if (type != hwmon_in) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + if (attr != hwmon_in_lcrit_alarm) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + if (channel) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +There is only one channel, one attribute, and one type supported. As such, the checks are unnecessary.quoted
+ *val = !!(data->last_throttled & UNDERVOLTAGE_STICKY_BIT); + return 0; +} + +static umode_t rpi_is_visible(const void *_data, enum hwmon_sensor_types type, + u32 attr, int channel) +{ + if (type != hwmon_in) + return 0; + + if (attr != hwmon_in_lcrit_alarm) + return 0; + + if (channel) + return 0;Same as above. In the list below, there is not a single conditional attribute. Given that, the checks should be unnecessary, and it should be sufficient to just return 0444.quoted
+ + return 0444; +} + +static const u32 rpi_in_config[] = { + HWMON_I_LCRIT_ALARM, + 0 +}; + +static const struct hwmon_channel_info rpi_in = { + .type = hwmon_in, + .config = rpi_in_config, +}; + +static const struct hwmon_channel_info *rpi_info[] = { + &rpi_in, + NULL +}; + +static const struct hwmon_ops rpi_hwmon_ops = { + .is_visible = rpi_is_visible, + .read = rpi_read, +}; + +static const struct hwmon_chip_info rpi_chip_info = { + .ops = &rpi_hwmon_ops, + .info = rpi_info, +}; + +static int rpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *fw_node; + struct rpi_hwmon_data *data; + int ret; + + data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!data) + return -ENOMEM; + + fw_node = of_get_parent(dev->of_node); + if (!fw_node) { + dev_err(dev, "Missing firmware node\n"); + return -ENOENT; + } + + data->fw = rpi_firmware_get(fw_node); + of_node_put(fw_node); + if (!data->fw) + return -EPROBE_DEFER; + + ret = rpi_firmware_property(data->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_THROTTLED, + &data->last_throttled, + sizeof(data->last_throttled)); + if (ret) { + dev_info(dev, "Firmware doesn't support GET_THROTTLED\n");If this is an error -> dev_err().I wasn't sure. If the firmware is too old, we cannot provide this feature and it's a waste of resources to load this driver. On the other side i don't want to confuse people this is something bad.
Then I would suggest to return -ENODEV. Guenter
Stefanquoted
quoted
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;or return -ENODEV.quoted
+ } + + data->hwmon_dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, "rpi_volt", + data, + &rpi_chip_info, + NULL); + + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&data->get_values_poll_work, get_values_poll); + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); + + if (!PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(data->hwmon_dev)) + schedule_delayed_work(&data->get_values_poll_work, 2 * HZ); + + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(data->hwmon_dev); +} + +static int rpi_hwmon_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct rpi_hwmon_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&data->get_values_poll_work); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id rpi_hwmon_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "raspberrypi,bcm2835-hwmon", }, + { /* sentinel */}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpi_hwmon_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver rpi_hwmon_driver = { + .probe = rpi_hwmon_probe, + .remove = rpi_hwmon_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "raspberrypi-hwmon", + .of_match_table = rpi_hwmon_of_match, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(rpi_hwmon_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Stefan Wahren [off-list ref]"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Raspberry Pi voltage sensor driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel