Thread (113 messages) 113 messages, 13 authors, 2018-09-13

[PATCH v2 13/40] vfio: Add support for Shared Virtual Addressing

From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-24 11:44:58
Also in: kvm, linux-acpi, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-mm, linux-pci

Hi,

On 23/05/18 10:38, Xu Zaibo wrote:
quoted
+static int vfio_iommu_bind_group(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
+???????????????? struct vfio_group *group,
+???????????????? struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm)
+{
+??? int ret;
+??? bool enabled_sva = false;
+??? struct vfio_iommu_sva_bind_data data = {
+??????? .vfio_mm??? = vfio_mm,
+??????? .iommu??????? = iommu,
+??????? .count??????? = 0,
+??? };
+
+??? if (!group->sva_enabled) {
+??????? ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(group->iommu_group, NULL,
+?????????????????????????? vfio_iommu_sva_init);
Do we need to do *sva_init here or do anything to avoid repeated
initiation?
while another process already did initiation at this device, I think
that current process will get an EEXIST.
Right, sva_init() must be called once for any device that intends to use
bind(). For the second process though, group->sva_enabled will be true
so we won't call sva_init() again, only bind().

Thanks,
Jean
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help